Why Riot is Deleting the WRONG Map │ VALORANTyoutubeまとめサイト

【視聴数　16788】

【チャンネル名　Valorant Ascended】

【タグ　valorant,valorant gameplay,valorant montage,valorant tips,valorant tournament,valorant tips and tricks,valorant crosshair,valorant new skins,valorant new map,valorant guide,valorant esports,valorant tier list,valorant tutorial,valorant pro gameplay,valorant pro,valorant highlights,valorant cinematic,valorant best,valorant beginners guide】

コメント（119件）

BLUEZIN より:

6月 21, 2022 4:35 pm

Fuckin fracture

返信
ApexPredTTV より:

6月 21, 2022 4:38 pm

Fracture needed to be removed!

返信
Timothy Hour より:

6月 21, 2022 4:59 pm

i’m a icebox hater and fracture enjoyer but i don’t think split should’ve been rotated out i personally think icebox should

返信
HaydenDom より:

6月 21, 2022 5:26 pm

why would they remove the 2nd newest and one of the most unique (in terms of design) maps? split seems like the right call to me (although bind would have worked too)

返信
zach より:

6月 21, 2022 5:27 pm

I’m fine with it bc split is by far my worst map

返信
Karol より:

6月 21, 2022 5:46 pm

i never usually have opinions on valorant updates but removing split after the fact that when they released fracture, suicide rates went up, i will never understand or agree with

返信
Jem より:

6月 21, 2022 5:49 pm

how many times do you hear fuck split over fuck breeze and fracture

返信
patrik より:

6月 21, 2022 5:55 pm

remove everything besides ascent, fracture and icebox

返信
Mysterious Hooded Guy より:

6月 21, 2022 6:04 pm

bro on valorant tracker split is the map with the highest win rate for me. gg to my rank 🙁

返信
Lumen Dusk より:

6月 21, 2022 6:04 pm

I actually think they pick Split bcuz Pearl is gonna be a more complicated version of Split XD narrow choke point with long rotates through spawn which makes mid the most contested. I think however Split mid aren’t so hot, maybe it’s great to lurk around in but not as a utility dump to contest for. Pearl however…

返信
Fireblaze683 より:

6月 21, 2022 6:49 pm

I think the problem with breeze is that the meta has been kinda “figured out” for A site. If you’re trying to defend A site breeze and the enemy is running viper + 2 or, god forbid, 3 initiators, it’s so oppressive you’re practically forced into retake every round if the enemy has any teamwork at all.

返信
VG Yugi より:

6月 21, 2022 6:56 pm

Pearl is is too similar to Split which is why it’s gone

返信
AlphaMalaysia より:

6月 21, 2022 6:58 pm

Don’t take my personal opinion as it’s biased, but Icebox should be removed instead of Split. I fxking hate the map haha

返信
YGO Doggo より:

6月 21, 2022 7:00 pm

I’m glad split is going. I can’t remember the last time I’ve enjoyed a game in split in comp or customs

返信
Parfuki より:

6月 21, 2022 7:13 pm

Just remove Fracture and we are all happy

返信
c2o2 - より:

6月 21, 2022 7:13 pm

get bind out, what will sentinels do now

返信
Cacaoolo より:

6月 21, 2022 7:19 pm

Split is trash and is completely defense sided thank god they removed it

返信
Elemental Pink より:

6月 21, 2022 7:25 pm

Out of my last 18 games, 50% of them are either Breeze or Fractured… I would take Split any day.

返信
Clinton D'Costa より:

6月 21, 2022 7:26 pm

One of the reasons the devs mentioned was how new the maps was. Since Fracture and Breeze are the newest maps, they were definitely not going to get removed. Another reason could specifically be because Breeze was played so little. The devs want people to play all maps almost equally. And because the map has lower agent diversity, it makes it easier for newer players to learn the map. Because one of the issues with adding a lot of maps isn’t only with learning new maps, but learning a lot of the agents on them as well. So, both points, the low pick rate and low agent pool is exactly why Breeze shouldn’t/can’t be removed. And again, although having relatively small number of agents in a map may be bad thing as a viewer, it certainly makes sense to have maps where some agents are must haves. Because when maps have specific agents that are good on it, it makes it easier to learn both the map and the agent. While you can learn another map with another agent.

Keeping that in mind, I think Split was the right decision. One way to look at it is that once Split is removed from the map pool, it will be a very long time until it gets rotated again. So, by getting done with it already, you don’t have to worry about later on. I’m guessing Acent or Bind might be the next ones to get rotared. Either way, from a dev stand point and the overall game health standpoint, it makes sense.

Because at the end of the day, you want to keep your current fanbase happy, but you also want new players coming in who are not overwhelmed by all the choices and range of stuff that you can do in this game.

返信
Ziggidy_Bop より:

6月 21, 2022 7:49 pm

I think the main reason they removed it is just because besides the verticality of Split, by design Pearl and Split share a lot of qualities. Generally tight areas with long site lines, little to no gimmick, etc. I still don’t think they should have removed it and considering I’ve mostly seen people against the removal, the general sentiment seems to lean towards a different map getting removed. I was thinking it should have been Bind or Breeze, Bind since its the original and could use some minor changes to spice it up, and Breeze basiaclly for what you said in this vid.

The 7 map pool makes sense and should be for pro play, and despite what a lot of community that doesn’t even acknowledge the existence of VCT, ranked should mirror the pro structre with the 7 map pool. I don’t think they should be taking the removed map out of the unrated pool tho imo. It’s unrated, if an iron 1 can go duo with a top 10 radiant, then saying you only want the ranked maps in unrated to “teach” new players the maps they’ll play in ranked, is just contradicts what unrated is supposed to be.

And the rotation should be every VCT stage imo, but I know it would never be that fast, especially considering Riot is going against their own policy of 2 weeks since release for agents to be allowed in pro play, and 4 weeks for a map. They did it for Fracture with LCQ, Chamber for Champs, now are doing it agian with Pearl, and may have done more previously but I can’t remember that far. Like Rito needs to either change the rule or follow it. If the grace periods are not enough that’s fine, just say so and change it don’t say you have this rule that applies for new agents and maps being introduced into pro play and then ignore it half the time. Main point being, the new rotation with Pearl should be introduced for LCQ because it’ll be well past 4 weeks (they technically could probably add it for playoffs of Copenhagen but it’d be dumb to do it), and unless pros are telling Riot behind the scenes that its not enough time, like I said the 4 weeks after release rule, should be dropped.

返信