【視聴数 85302】
【チャンネル名 Goldec】
【タグ Valorant,csgo,counter strike,counter strike 2,counter strike clips,counter strike funny,counter-strike,counter-strike global offensive,csgo clips,csgo memes,csgo moments,funny moments,global offensive,half life,source,source 2,valve,valorant clips,valorant vs csgo,csgo vs valorant,video essay,story animation,after effects,TDM Heyzeus,ohnepixel,anomaly,arrow,arrow csgo,warowl,war owl,nadeking,nade king,3kliksphillip,sparkles csgo,franzj,cat memes】
The funniest part of csgo vs valorant beef is like
Valorant players literally just do not care about cs. I dont think ive seen a single instance of a valorant player hating on csgo.
But also cs is infinitely better because valorant is full of straight people and i dont agree with that. Real cs players only like big manly men.
I would say the main factor which puts csgo over valorant is it’s modularity. Csgo is much more than a 5v5 defusal game. Theres more fun and casual gamemodes like flying scoutsmen, and the whole world of community servers with modes like jailbreak, bhop and surf. Theres not really that freedom in valorant to do anything more than play the game as intended. Stretching past that, csgo’s skin economy is far superior to valorant. To have a game which gives you the chance to invest, and make profit (even gamble, which i dont recommend doing lmao) just brings it to a whole new level. Its the reason why the game hasnt died for the past 11 years and continues to grow. Of course valorant has the disadvantage in time, but i doubt riot will open up their game to be modified by the community, considering they’re blocking things as simple as stretched resolution, as well as their non existent, fixed price skin economy which takes out the scarcity and absolute flex of having a knife
its not, next question
I feel like saying csgo skins are better cause you can make money from them + all the rarity aspects seems like saying that buying an nft and hanging it on the wall is better than buying a painting with no resale value and hanging it on the wall. It seems like a hypercapitalist type mindset like let people just enjoy art for the sake of it being art no matter wether it’s fungible or not or wether it can make them rich or not. Idk I feel like the profit motive always kills genuine passion and collection. Like in pokemon cards for example😊
6:49 Bros never heard of leage of legends
I actually play both games with friends and enjoy both a lot, but there’s a few things I don’t agree, for example Valorant having an expiration date. In my opinion having new utility coming out every so often, and having different metas makes the gameplay change a lot, and makes the game feel fresh from act to act, while in CS I feel like it’s much more about perfecting skills in aim and utility with your team, and to me personally makes me get tired of CS from time to time cause the matches dont feel very unique, but I always come back to it.
Valorant was amazing in Beta. I enjoyed it more than CS:GO, mostly because the abilities were used like utility. Now its just a glorified Overwatch clone.
Boiling Valorant to just abilities and then saying that makes it bad seems like someone who hasn’t played Valorant. You basically took the core concept of the game said it was bad and then said csgo is better because it doesn’t use it and it relies on gunplay instead.
My take on this is like Team Fortress vs Paladins (or overwatch)
TF2 is a much simpler game that has only a few classes, no abilities (except demoknight charge, scout mad milk, jarate etc.)
Paladins has many more characters which all have unique abilities, perk decks which give small boosts to abilities and are unique to every character aswell as buying items during games that do stuff like reducing cooldowns, increasing reload speed, lowering all damage taken by a small percentage and a few other less major ones.
This comparison is also similar in terms of skins; TF2 items have actual value, they can be resold on the market or traded while in Paladins when you buy a skin you can use it ingame and that’s about it
My point is: CS:GO and Valorant are games that share some features but have ones that make them distinct from eachother and have similar comparisons in other game genres
Same issuse for me, i play csgo since 2017 for about 5 years then dropped it, then i tried valorant with my friend in the first 2 years of the the new game, got dia 3 and suddenly i cant keep up with it anymore, i mean the aim still pretty sharp but some how, smoke and flashes are so fking weird. 😂
Valorant: Has giant yellow glow around enemy to help you see them
CSGO: 800×600 4:3 stretched
2:44 You didn’t include The WarOwl. He also makes very good content for CSGO.
Damn Im old. I feel like csgo is one of the latest games Ive played but now its so old that people who started FPS games on Valorant are really good at them and are switching into CS as new players. Thats fucking whack.
Honestly a very good video
dad come back whit milk 😂😂😂
I play valorant because it has a working anti-cheat, has staff that actively make an attempt to ban people cheating, and they actually make an effort to sue companies releasing cheats for the game. This is the only reason I play valorant. Cheating in csgo is way too easy and its easier now than ever (no overwatch).
After a few thousand hours of play I realized something and that is that comparing them does not make sense. They are two completely different games, valo wants to compete with cs but in my opinion it competes more with overwatch and is even closer to looking like over than cs. I think the only people who compare them are people who haven’t really played either one. In val there are abilities that you cannot skip since they represent half of the gameplay, therefore it looks, feels and plays completely different. The only thing they are alike is in the mechanics of planting a bomb. When I understood that, I stopped comparing them and now I compare them more with Overwatch. Cs is still undefeated. I enjoy both though
1 csgo sweat beats 20 valorant pros. Fight me
Underrated af
As an ex cs player and actual valorant player I do disagree about the skins, calling the skins themself better because float, rarity exists its a weird take. For example you can have one of a kind items, but in reality that’s just ‘some skins are more rare’ they are not objectively better in game, that’s just some pride for having something different. If we talk about the vast majority how we should when we speak about skins in general objectively then in valorant you can upgrade them, you have finishes for the last kill, different sounds and much more. Now I do agree that some skins are amazingly looking in game, but then we need to think about accessibility aswell, those amazing ones you’ll never truly have them, some are truly one of a kind in the world after all. Now the only realistical answer why would the skins be better in cs its because of the market, but the market its not truly about the quality of the skins themself, its more about where its worth more to invest which its a totally different discussion, I would totally agree if it would be about where investing money and not the quality of the skins from an objective point of view.